AIG - "Scientists--are they biased?"
Q: Surely scientists want to search for truth; they are supposed to be unbiased … aren’t they?AIG's Evolutionist Quote of the WeekA: It is time for people to realize that what scientists believe about their origins does determine how they look at the world.
We received a letter from a person who’d been named the editor for a geologic society. He was asked to provide articles of substance for their newsletter. In his first issue he included articles that questioned established evolutionary geologic principles. In less than two weeks, members of the society demanded his resignation and the return of all the materials that he had, even when these actions were in violation of the society’s constitution.
This is not an isolated case. We’ve heard of graduate students being refused entry into schools because they believed in creation, and other scientists being driven out of their fields because of their creation beliefs. Whenever a discovery is made that casts serious doubt on evolution, it’s often quickly hidden and not published in the major journals.
None of this should be surprising to those of us who get our answers in God’s Word—after all, man’s heart is deceitful and rebels against the Truth of the Creator God. That’s why we need ministries like Answers in Genesis to tell The truth to the world.
“It becomes clear now that the whole justification of Jesus’ life and death is predicated on the existence of Adam and the forbidden fruit he and Eve ate. Without the original sin, who needs to be redeemed? Without Adam’s fall into a life of constant sin terminated by death, what purpose is there to Christianity? None.”
– G. Richard Bozarth, The Meaning of Evolution, American Atheist, p. 30, September 20, 1979.
2 Comments:
Trying to stir things up Sean?
Just as a note. It is interesting how when science disproves evolution, it is all buried and then published with a new twist that makes them come out smelling like roses.
Brookhaven National Laboratory did a test in which they attempted to recreate what they think happened at the exact moment of the big bang, and the very first nano seconds of the universe.
The study was paid for with your tax money through a government grant.
They expected to collide two gold atoms at extremely high speeds, creating a gas 150,000 times hotter than the center of the sun. You can read all the scientific data here. They expected it to create a state of gas, thus backing up the big bang theory.
Instead of a state of gas, it formed a liquid! 150,000 times hotter than the sun!
Teaching hearts, a web site on creation, has an article in which they call it the “Big Splash.”
They say,
“Physicists from the Brookhaven National Laboratory released the results of a three year experiment in April 2005. The experiment that was supposed to demonstrate that a gas was formed at the big bang produced a liquid! So what does that do to the theory of expanding gases rushing out into space? Slows it down quite a bit! The experiment disproved the big bang hypothesis! They should have read the Bible. The Bible describes the abyss as being covered with liquid!”
Instead of admitting failure, they proclaimed:
“RHIC Scientists Serve Up “Perfect” Liquid - New state of matter more remarkable than predicted!”
Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director of the DOE Office of Science said:
“Once again, the physics research sponsored by the Department of Energy is producing historic results,” said Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman, a trained chemical engineer. “The DOE is the principal federal funder of basic research in the physical sciences, including nuclear and high-energy physics. With today’s announcement we see that investment paying off.”
“The truly stunning finding at RHIC that the new state of matter created in the collisions of gold ions is more like a liquid than a gas gives us a profound insight into the earliest moments of the universe,”
Not only did the government not acknowledge the failure, they think it was money well spent. I agree, it was money well spent if they had acknowledged the outcome was completely different, and contradictory to the theory of evolution that they were trying to prove.
Amazing!
-Matt
It doesn't look like my links worked. Here they are:
Brookhaven Study Details:
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=05-38
Teaching Hearts Web Site:
http://www.teachinghearts.org/dre09creationnotes.html
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
Back to Blog